Review: Resident Evil: Extinction
You might be wondering, "What, pray tell, might that matter be?" Why, it's the nebulous evil machinations of the Umbrella Corporation, of course. Rather than focus on something simple and visceral like, say, survival, the film spends nearly half its time away from our heroes, deep in the bowels of some underground Umbrella compound. So jarring were these repeated departures, that it felt almost as if they were happening in some other (lower budget) film. And you know, I'm fine with evil corporations. Exaggerated reflections of the times in pop culture and all that tasty goodness. But the extent to which Umbrella was the focus of RE:E left the film feeling ill-paced to the point of almost slow.
That said, there were some good parts. Ali Larter, as Claire Redfield, provided a strong, human, counterpoint to Alice's superpowered heroine. And that superpowered heroine? Was cool as hell. Milla Jovovich was absolutely fierce, committing fully to a role that's taken some admittedly dubious turns over the course of the series, and lending a tenderness that manages to ground the over-the-top character. The scenes actually involving zombies (and/or their furry and feathered brethren) were exciting and well-done (if not, occasionally, done before), including one rather spectacular early scene with the zombie dogs that felt a bit out of place, but was awesome enough not to matter.
Is it worth seeing? Sure. But this is a safe wait for rental. If you're headed to the theaters, save your cash for a worthier venture like 3:10 to Yuma.
Comments
Uw, that's unhappy news that it didn't earn up to potential . I'll happily wait for rental later on. Yay for Ali Larter though!
Posted by: Amber | September 26, 2007 6:32 PM
I stumbled upon your blog via Technorati. It was the subtitle ("Eating Brains So You Don't Have To.") That's it; that's all it took. You have a great writing style. Keep it up!
Posted by: Chris | February 1, 2008 11:21 AM